Loading...
Not sure where to start? We help you structure your tech strategy, design your business processes, and create roadmaps that align technology with your goals.
Strategy before code.
A lot of expensive engineering is the consequence of a decision made months earlier by someone who did not have the information to make it — a stack chosen because a first hire knew it, a build started because buying was never priced, a rewrite begun because nobody measured what was actually slow.
Consulting engagements here are short and end in a document you can act on: what is feasible, what it will roughly cost, what it commits you to, and what the alternatives were. We are equally willing to conclude that you should not build the thing, or should buy it instead.
This is also the right starting point if you are preparing for investment or due diligence, where someone will shortly be asking these questions on your behalf and you would rather answer them first.
Usually one to three weeks: interviews with the people who hold the context, a review of whatever exists already, then a written assessment and a working session to go through it. You are left with the document, not with a dependency on us.
No, and the advice is written on the assumption that you might not. If the recommendation is to buy an off-the-shelf product or to hire in-house, that is what it will say — a consulting engagement that always concludes 'hire us to build it' is not worth reading.
Yes, from either side. For founders that means finding what an investor's reviewer will find, while there is still time to fix it. For investors it means an independent read on architecture, delivery capability and the risk carried in the codebase.
Figures quoted are excl. BTW. See pricing for the full engagement models.
Not the right fit? These might be.
Tell us what you are trying to build. We will tell you what we would do and what it would cost, before you commit to anything.